Back Home About Us Contact Us
Town Charters
Seniors
Federal Budget
Ethics
Hall of Shame
Education
Unions
Binding Arbitration
State - Budget
Local - Budget
Prevailing Wage
Jobs
Health Care
Referendum
Eminent Domain
Group Homes
Consortium
TABOR
Editorials
Tax Talk
Press Releases
Find Representatives
Web Sites
Media
CT Taxpayer Groups
 
Home
June 22, 2009

June 22, 2009


By Susan Kniep, President
The Federation of Connecticut Taxpayer Organizations
Website: http://ctact.org/
Email: fctopresident@aol.com
Telephone: 860-841-8032

 

STATES AND TOWNS IN CRISIS!

 

BAILOUT OR BANKRUPTCY?

 

How long can California and Connecticut taxpayers continue to support public employee pensions exceeding $200,000 and retiree health and dental benefits costing in excess of $40 billion?  Could bankruptcy signal the death knell of unions contracts? 

 

 

Those on the trail to the California Gold Rush have Washington in their sights.  With the gold having been chiseled away by  public employees, California is now facing a budget shortfall of $24 billion.  The answer is, of course, a Washington handout as California’s State Treasurer installs a "TARP O' The Morning To Ya" ring tone on his cell phone before making the call to U.S. Treasury Secretary Tim Giethner asking for a guarantee of California’s debts.   California’s credit rating is in the tank, the lowest of the 50 states, so there is little hope that the banks will rush in to throw money at the feet of the Terminator who proposed borrowing billions and backing the loans through Tax and Revenue Anticipation Notes.   But the banks are a little skittish so what better way to say show me the money than to have the feds assure the banks that the Treasury will buy the bank’s debt if California defaults on the notes.  However, Washington is not too anxious to toss out a rescue line because they know a bailout for California would serve as a catalyst for other states which are drowning in debt.  

 

One other little fly in the ointment is those pesky pension funds, two of which have lost billions in value.  The California Public Employees’ Retirement System is the largest pension fund in the US and the fourth largest in the world. In Oct, 2007 it held $260 billion in assets, which sank to $186 billion at the end of 2008. 

 

But while California, with the 5th largest economy in the world, is on a respirator, its state retirees are flashing their pearly whites as they are smiling all the way to the bank.  Retiree health and dental benefits are costing California taxpayers in excess of $48 billion.  More than 5,000 retirees have struck it rich, collecting pensions well in excess of $100,000.  Some retirees have hit the jackpot with annual pensions of $499,674; $296,666; $278,055; $265,741; $255,600; $254,745; $239,636; $232,947; $231,164; $224,812 and so on.  The following web link provides access to thousands of California pensions which far exceed what many taxpayers will ever make in their lifetime.  http://www.californiapensionreform.com/calpers/

 

And Connecticut is close behind, facing a budget deficit which could reach or exceed $10 billion as some state employees receive pensions well in excess of $100,000, with some reaching $200,000.   Soon these pensions will be posted on FCTO’s web site. 

In January, 2008, the Center for Budget and Policy Priorities, reported that 29 states “faced an estimated $48 billion in combined shortfalls in their budgets for fiscal year 2009, with at least three other states expecting budget problems in fiscal year 2010”.   Because the majority of states cannot run a budget deficit or borrow money to cover their operating costs, they must resort to accessing reserves, reducing costs, or raising taxes. 

 

Since January, 2008, our economy has been in a free fall, reducing a family’s net worth by 30% or more as the unemployment rate climbs to the highest it has been in 50 years. 

 

Compounding the problem for cash-strapped cities and states, are cash-strapped taxpayers who can no longer be relied on to keep the candy store open to feed the insatiable appetite of public employees who continue to drive State and local budgets to the brink.   

 

Recently, USA Today reported that public employees earned benefits on average twice as much as private sector workers.  

 

But the disparity between the wages and benefits of the private sector and public sector worker coupled with the fact that tax collection rates are down is no deterrent to State California lawmakers who are going the extra mile to protect their voting block, the public sector unions.  These lawmakers are looking to pass legislation to make it difficult for California cities and towns to file for bankruptcy knowing that the end result could be the demise of union contracts.    

The Wall Street Journal quoted the communications director of the California Professional Firefighters who said "What we don't want is for cities to use bankruptcy as a negotiating tactic rather than a legit response to fiscal issues…. or to work in concert to rid themselves of union contracts by declaring bankruptcy.”

But bankruptcy may be the only hope which taxpayers have to end the crippling effects of union contracts on state and local taxes.  

 

In May of 2008, officials in Vallejo, California, a suburb of San Francisco with a population of 117,000, took the initial step to file for bankruptcy when it realized it could not pay its bills due to a plummeting tax collection rate and escalating costs for police and fire contracts.  These contracts required minimum staffing, drove overtime costs, which, with benefits, accounted for 80% of Vallejo’s $89 million budget. 

 

But California is not alone when locked into unrealistic employee union contracts or paying for excessive pensions which directly impact the financial stability of a state or town. 

 

In Pensacola, Florida, the Police Chief will join the millionaires club of public officials when he retires at 56.  When asked Deal or No Deal, he took the deal which will pay him in retirement benefits $125,771 which is more than what he is currently making at $115,112.    It has been reported that over 30 years, the Police Chief’s pension could grow from $160,000 to $280,000 based on cost of living increases.  He will also receive a lump sum payment of $674,000 from the Deferred Retirement Option Program, which is similar to the DROP Program in East Hartford, Connecticut.  

 

In East Hartford, this program allows the employee to keep working for up to five years prior to retirement, collect his pay check, and concurrently have 96% of his pension dropped into a savings account which is managed by the employee.   At the end of that five year period, the employee will collect his full pension which could exceed $100,000 and receive a lump sum payment of $400,000 or more. 

The Center for Retirement Research at Boston College reports that state pension fund losses total $865.1 billion.  The Center reported that to return to 2007 funding levels by 2010, the 109 funds would need annual returns of 52 percent.   With a downturn in the stock market impacting the valuations of pension funds coupled with many public sector employees allowed to retire at age 52 or younger, the demand on pension funds is growing requiring States like Rhode Island to make contributions to its pension funds which will equal 25 percent of their 2010 payroll expense and 30 percent of 2011 payroll expenses.  

Of course, the funding source for these lucrative pensions is the taxpayer, who worked in the private sector and is now unemployed with his own pension in jeopardy.

In the State of Connecticut, Governor Jodi Rell presented a state budget with no tax increase in sympathy with her constituents who are suffering in this recession.  She pleaded with the Democrat-controlled state legislature to give her and local elected officials the tools they need to manage the State and the 169 towns as she sought Binding Arbitration reform.  The legislature has ignored her requests to suspend binding arbitration requirements for two years and limit mandatory subjects of binding arbitration to salaries and benefits.    Facing a state budget deficit of $1 billion in 2009 and $9 billion for 2010-2011, Connecticut’s Democrat-controlled state legislature instead awarded 5200 state employees an $86 million contract, with some state employees receiving wage increases of 6%.   Some state unions gave concessions but received a two year no layoff clause in return. 

Wanting more, Connecticut State employee unions launched TV ads costing them over $100,000 with the message – INCREASE TAXES - even though Connecticut ranks as one of the highest taxed states in the nation!  

As California and Connecticut teeter on the edge of the abyss which is quickly filing with uncontrollable debt, their fate is imminent as are other states and towns throughout the country.  Ultimately public sector union demands will become a moot issue as anticipated tax collection rates are not realized, reserve funds are depleted, and government employee costs exceed the taxpayers’ ability to pay.   The end result will be bankruptcy which will be the death knell to public sector employee union contracts throughout the country! 

But bankruptcy could also provide opportunities for governments to restructure and to work more cost effectively and efficiently.  Union contracts could be replaced by a bidding process allowing those in the private sector who have lost their jobs and have the qualifications to vie for the public sector jobs which must be retained.  The end result would be a dedicated and qualified work force whose longevity is determined by the worker’s capabilities and dedication to perfection as opposed to the heavy handedness of a pack of employees who have an expectation of increased wages and benefits regardless of performance.    Candidates for police and fire departments could be garnered from our many heroes who are returning home from fighting abroad who should be given an opportunity to serve their communities.   The monopoly of the teachers unions could be replaced by a voucher system serving as a catalyst for private schools to emerge giving all families an opportunity to have their child educated in a school of their choice, i.e. public or private.   

Yes, bankruptcy could be the death knell to public sector unions but the end result could be a more efficient and productive public sector work force leading our country in this global economy.